Uses of Interface
net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates.Postulate

Packages that use Postulate

Package	Description
net.sf.tweety.arg.rankings.postulates
net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates
net.sf.tweety.logics.pl.postulates

Uses of Postulate in net.sf.tweety.arg.rankings.postulates

Classes in net.sf.tweety.arg.rankings.postulates that implement Postulate

Modifier and Type	Class	Description
class	RaAbstraction	The "abstraction" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaAdditionOfAttackBranch	The "addition of attack branch" postulate for ranking semantics as formalized in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaAdditionOfDefenseBranch	The "addition of defense branch" postulate for ranking semantics as formalized in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaAttackVsFullDefense	The "attack vs full defense" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaCardinalityPrecedence	The "cardinality precedence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaCounterTransitivity	The "counter-transitivity" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaDefensePrecedence	The "defense precedence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaDistDefensePrecedence	The "distributed-defense precedence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaIncreaseOfAttackBranch	The "increase of attack branch" postulate for ranking semantics as formalized in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaIncreaseOfDefenseBranch	The "increase of defense branch" postulate for ranking semantics as formalized in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaIndependence	The "independence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RankingPostulate	An abstract postulate for ranking-based semantics in abstract argumentation; the ancestor of all concrete postulates.
class	RaNonAttackedEquivalence	The "non-attacked equivalence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaQualityPrecedence	The "quality precedence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaSelfContradiction	The "self-contradiction" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Matt, Toni.
class	RaStrictAdditionOfDefenseBranch	The "strict addition of defense branch" postulate for ranking semantics as formalized in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaStrictCounterTransitivity	The "strict counter-transitivity" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed by [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.
class	RaTotal	The "total" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed in [Bonzon, Delobelle, Konieczny, Maudet.
class	RaVoidPrecedence	The "void precedence" postulate for ranking semantics as proposed by [Amgoud, Ben-Naim.

Uses of Postulate in net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates

Methods in net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates with parameters of type Postulate

Modifier and Type	Method	Description
void	PostulateEvaluationReport.addNegativeInstance(Postulate<S> postulate, java.util.Collection<S> instance)	Adds a negative instance for the given postulate
void	PostulateEvaluationReport.addNotApplicableInstance(Postulate<S> postulate, java.util.Collection<S> instance)	Adds an instance that is not applicable for the given postulate
void	PostulateEvaluationReport.addPositiveInstance(Postulate<S> postulate, java.util.Collection<S> instance)	Adds a positive instance for the given postulate (that is applicable)
void	PostulateEvaluator.addPostulate(Postulate<T> p)	Adds the given postulate
java.util.Collection<java.util.Collection<S>>	PostulateEvaluationReport.getNegativeInstances(Postulate<S> postulate)	Returns the negative instances for the given postulate
boolean	PostulateEvaluator.removePostulate(Postulate<T> p)	Removes the given postulate

Method parameters in net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates with type arguments of type Postulate

Modifier and Type	Method	Description
void	PostulateEvaluator.addAllPostulates(java.util.Collection<? extends Postulate<T>> postulates)	Adds all postulates in the given collection.
void	PostulateEvaluator.removeAllPostulates(java.util.Collection<? extends Postulate<T>> postulates)	Removes all postulates in the given collection.

Constructor parameters in net.sf.tweety.commons.postulates with type arguments of type Postulate

Constructor	Description
PostulateEvaluationReport(PostulateEvaluatable<S> ev, java.util.List<Postulate<S>> postulates)	Creates a new evaluation report for the given approach and set of postulates
PostulateEvaluator(BeliefSetIterator<T,U> iterator, PostulateEvaluatable<T> ev, java.util.Collection<Postulate<T>> postulates)	Creates a new evaluator for the given evaluatable and belief base generator.

Uses of Postulate in net.sf.tweety.logics.pl.postulates

Classes in net.sf.tweety.logics.pl.postulates that implement Postulate

Modifier and Type	Class	Description
class	ImAdjunctionInvariance	The "adjunction invariance" postulate for inconsistency measures: The set notation of knowledge bases should be equivalent to the conjunction of its formulas in terms of inconsistency values.
class	ImAttenuation	The "attenuation" postulate for inconsistency measures: Minimal inconsistent sets of smaller size should have a larger inconsistency value.
class	ImConsistency	The "consistency" postulate for inconsistency measures: Consistent knowledge bases receive the minimal inconsistency value (0) and all inconsistent knowledge bases have strictly positive inconsistency values.
class	ImContradiction	The "contradiction" postulate for inconsistency measures: A knowledge base is maximally inconsistent if all non-empty subsets are inconsistent.
class	ImDominance	The "dominance" postulate for inconsistency measures: Substituting a consistent formula by a weaker formula should not increase the inconsistency value.
class	ImEqualConflict	The "equal conflict" postulate for inconsistency measures: Minimal inconsistent subsets of the same size should have the same inconsistency value.
class	ImExchange	The "exchange" postulate for inconsistency measures: Exchanging consistent parts of a knowledge base with equivalent ones should not change the inconsistency value.
class	ImFreeFormulaDilution	The "free-formula dilution" postulate for inconsistency measures: Removing a formula not participating in any minimal inconsistent set does not make the inconsistency value larger.
class	ImFreeFormulaIndependence	The "free-formula independence" postulate for inconsistency measures: Removing a formula not participating in any minimal inconsistent set (= a free formula) does not change the inconsistency value.
class	ImIrrelevanceOfSyntax	The "irrelevance of syntax" postulate for inconsistency measures: Knowledge bases with pairwise equivalent formulas should receive the same inconsistency value.
class	ImMINormalization	The "MI-normalization" postulate for inconsistency measures: The inconsistency value of any minimal inconsistent subset is 1.
class	ImMISeparability	The "MI-separability" postulate for inconsistency measures: The sum of inconsistency values of two knowledge bases with non-interfering sets of minimal inconsistent subsets should be the same as the inconsistency value of their union.
class	ImMonotony	The "monotony" postulate for inconsistency measures: Adding information to a belief base cannot decrease the inconsistency value.
class	ImNormalization	The "normalization" postulate for inconsistency measures: The inconsistency value is always in the unit interval [0,1], making it possible to compare inconsistency values for knowledge bases of different sizes.
class	ImPenalty	The "penalty" postulate for inconsistency measures: Adding a formula that participates in an inconsistency (i.e.
class	ImPostulate	An abstract postulate for inconsistency measures in propositional logic; the ancestor of all concrete postulates.
class	ImSafeFormulaIndependence	The "safe-formula independence" postulate for inconsistency measures: Removing a safe formula (i.e.
class	ImSuperAdditivity	The "super-additivity" postulate for inconsistency measures: The sum of the inconsistency values of two disjoint knowledge bases is not larger than the inconsistency value of the joint knowledge base.
class	ImWeakDominance	A weaker variant of the "dominance" postulate using prime implicates, proposed in [Jabbour et al.