Uses of Class
org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner.AbstractDungReasoner
Package
Description
-
Uses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner
Modifier and TypeClassDescriptionclass
Ancestor class for reasoners that are tailored towards computing the set {a | a is credulously/skeptically accepted wrt.class
Ancestor class for all extension-based reasoners.class
Uses a provided SAT solver to solve reasoning problems in AAFs.class
Implements the EEE approach ("exhaustively enumerate extensions") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF, cf.class
Implements the Fudge approach to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.class
Implements the IAQ approach ("iterative acceptability queries") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF, cf.class
This reasoner makes use of an external executable for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation.class
This reasoner makes use of an external executable for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation.class
Reasoner for qualified sigma-semantics.class
Uses a SAT solver to determine complete extensions.class
Uses a SAT solver to determine stable extensions.class
Reasoner for CF2 extensions using scc-recursiveness.class
Reasoner for SCF2 extensions using scc-recursiveness.class
reasoner for SCOOC-naive semantics.class
Implements the SEE approach ("selective extension enumeration") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.class
Implements the SEEM approach ("selective extension enumeration with MaxSAT") to determine the set of credulously acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.class
Reasoner for semi-qualified sigma-semantics.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the admissible extensions.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the complete extensions.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the conflict-free extensions.class
simple reasoner for eager semanticsclass
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the grounded extension.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the ideal extension.class
Basic Implementation of a reasoner for initial sets A set of arguments S is considered initial iff it is non-empty and minimal among the non-empty admissible sets Ref: Yuming Xu and Claudette Cayrol.class
Reasoner for naive extensions.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the preferred extensions.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the resolution-based family of semantics.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the complete extensions.class
Universal scc-recursive reasoner initialize with any reasoner for a scc-recursive semanticsclass
This reasoner calculates claim based semi stable extensionsclass
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the stable extensions.class
This reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the stage extensions.class
Reasoner for solid admissibility a set of arguments E solid-defends an argument a, iff for all attackers b of a it holds that all arguments c which attack b are in E see: Liu, X., and Chen, W.class
Reasoner for Stage2 semantics using scc-recursiveness definition see: Dvorak, Gaggl: Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics 2012class
This class implements a stratified labeling reasoner.class
Reasoner for strong admissibilityclass
Implements the strongly undisputed semantics, as proposed in [Thimm.class
Implements the undisputed semantics, as proposed in [Thimm.class
Implements a general vacuous reduct reasoner, as proposed in [Thimm.class
Reasoner for weak admissibility the reasoner reduces the number of sets we have to check by computing candidate sets instead of checking all sets.class
Reasoner for weakly complete semantics as described in: see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense.class
Reasoner for weakly grounded semantics a set of arguments E is w-grounded iff it is w-complete and minimal Note: unlike the grounded extension which is unique, there can be more than one w-grounded extension see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense.class
Reasoner for weakly preferred semantics see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. -
Uses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner.serialisable
Modifier and TypeClassDescriptionclass
Ancestor class for serialisable AF reasonersclass
Serialised version of the admissible semanticsclass
Serialised version of the complete semanticsclass
Serialised version of the grounded semanticsclass
Serialised version of the preferred semanticsclass
Serialised version of the stable semanticsclass
This class represents a reasoner to compute the extensions of the strongly admissibleSemantics
by serialising unattacked initial sets.class
Serialised reasoner for the unchallenged semantics The unchallenged semantics amounts to exhaustively adding unattacked and unchallenged initial sets