Uses of Class
org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner.AbstractDungReasoner
Packages that use AbstractDungReasoner
Package
Description
-
Uses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner
Subclasses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasonerModifier and TypeClassDescriptionclassAncestor class for reasoners that are tailored towards computing the set {a | a is credulously/skeptically accepted wrt.classAncestor class for all extension-based reasoners.classUses a provided SAT solver to solve reasoning problems in AAFs.classImplements the EEE approach ("exhaustively enumerate extensions") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF, cf.classImplements the Fudge approach to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.classImplements the IAQ approach ("iterative acceptability queries") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF, cf.classThis reasoner makes use of an external executable for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation.classThis reasoner makes use of an external executable for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation.classReasoner for qualified sigma-semantics.classUses a SAT solver to determine complete extensions.classUses a SAT solver to determine stable extensions.classReasoner for CF2 extensions using scc-recursiveness.classReasoner for SCF2 extensions using scc-recursiveness.classreasoner for SCOOC-naive semantics.classImplements the SEE approach ("selective extension enumeration") to determine the set of acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.classImplements the SEEM approach ("selective extension enumeration with MaxSAT") to determine the set of credulously acceptable arguments of an AF wrt.classReasoner for semi-qualified sigma-semantics.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the admissible extensions.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the complete extensions.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the conflict-free extensions.classsimple reasoner for eager semanticsclassThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the grounded extension.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the ideal extension.classBasic Implementation of a reasoner for initial sets A set of arguments S is considered initial iff it is non-empty and minimal among the non-empty admissible sets Ref: Yuming Xu and Claudette Cayrol.classReasoner for naive extensions.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the preferred extensions.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the resolution-based family of semantics.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the complete extensions.classUniversal scc-recursive reasoner initialize with any reasoner for a scc-recursive semanticsclassThis reasoner calculates claim based semi stable extensionsclassThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the stable extensions.classThis reasoner for Dung theories performs inference on the stage extensions.classReasoner for solid admissibility a set of arguments E solid-defends an argument a, iff for all attackers b of a it holds that all arguments c which attack b are in E see: Liu, X., and Chen, W.classReasoner for Stage2 semantics using scc-recursiveness definition see: Dvorak, Gaggl: Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics 2012classThis class implements a stratified labeling reasoner.classReasoner for strong admissibilityclassImplements the strongly undisputed semantics, as proposed in [Thimm.classImplements the undisputed semantics, as proposed in [Thimm.classImplements a general vacuous reduct reasoner, as proposed in [Thimm.classReasoner for weak admissibility the reasoner reduces the number of sets we have to check by computing candidate sets instead of checking all sets.classReasoner for weakly complete semantics as described in: see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense.classReasoner for weakly grounded semantics a set of arguments E is w-grounded iff it is w-complete and minimal Note: unlike the grounded extension which is unique, there can be more than one w-grounded extension see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense.classReasoner for weakly preferred semantics see: Baumann, Brewka, Ulbricht: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. -
Uses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner.serialisable
Subclasses of AbstractDungReasoner in org.tweetyproject.arg.dung.reasoner.serialisableModifier and TypeClassDescriptionclassAncestor class for serialisable AF reasonersclassSerialised version of the admissible semanticsclassSerialised version of the complete semanticsclassSerialised version of the grounded semanticsclassSerialised version of the preferred semanticsclassSerialised version of the stable semanticsclassThis class represents a reasoner to compute the extensions of the strongly admissibleSemanticsby serialising unattacked initial sets.classSerialised reasoner for the unchallenged semantics The unchallenged semantics amounts to exhaustively adding unattacked and unchallenged initial sets